On
"FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2011" and "AT 2:53 AM" apparently,
I wrote "[censored]: The Story of An Internet Stalker". Since then, as per an agreement, I have been removing text that contains his name. I tried to do this with the original posting as well. However, the link itself contains the name. Therefore, I am reposting the story, so as to keep the story intact while removing the name, as per the agreement.
BH and I met a few years ago. It might have
been 2007, it might have been 2008. Any case, he
saw my videos and was initially not interested in
me, thinking that I looked like someone else
who he apparently didn't much care for. At least,
that's what I recall about what he said.
But then, according to him, from what I recall,
he was trying to visualize the perfect man to be
with. Apparently, when he was at some doctor
appointment, he visualized "me". That's literally
what he said. I asked for specifics, and he would
say, "It's you."
BH is Catholic, which must be quite the
mindfuck if he's also gay, which he overtly and
obviously is.
I was, at the time, transitioning
from generally not liking being around people, to
trying to reach out and have chats with people,
to learn about people. When he commented on my videos,
when we emailed each other, I quite enjoyed it. He
was quite repetitive, but hey, he was someone to
talk to. And talk he did. Talk, talk, talk.
About how much he loved me, how much he'd like to
meet up with me, how much he'd like to ... do sexual
stuff with me.
At the time, I was curious about homosexuality,
wondering about cocks, about sucking them, about
being with guys, about being sucked off by guys.
The little curiousity that I showed became the bedrock
of what was to follow.
I first showed mild curiousity. Then indifference.
I mean, hey, I was curious, but not THAT curious.
When he would continue to insist, it became annoying,
and eventually, my response to his sexual pleas
became a firm, hard - nah lol - became a passionate,
'Fuck No. Anyone BUT you.'
From this, so I theorized, he projected his own
internal conflict between religion and his sexuality
onto me, saying that I was a gay in denial, and that
being gay was OK. He would often call me Mary when
saying stuff like that.
A year ago - maybe two now - I decided that enough was
enough. To ask BH to back off. From this came
a year of off and on talking with him, with me
constantly trying to decide between not responding
to him, and talking to him to figure out what his
psychotic nature was, and perhaps to help him.
Y'know... maybe this whole thing was some sort of
gigantic misunderstanding.
Gigantic is too small a word, too calm a word,
to use for this type of quote misunderstanding quote.
I've always been the more shy type (my father once
said that it was a label I put on myself), and
a few years ago I was getting zero sex. I was also
not getting much physical touch. A little too much
detail for perhaps your and my liking, but I'd say
it's rather relavant.
I met up with an older man for cuddles and curiousity,
with emphasis on the cuddles. Why not a younger man?
'Cause younger people were, and are, intimidating
to me. Not debate-wise, but sexually. Partly, too,
I tend to like older people because they simply tend
to have more to say and I've always had an image that
younger people of common culture were idiots.
So: I met up with an older man and we did a lot of
cuddling and some experimentation. Not much
experimentation, though. Usually when I tell my life
story to people, I talk about how at about this time
I was listening to Alan Watts and the like, and
because the older man and I agreed that it would be
a good idea for me to meet a woman to fuck...
and that's how I met Jen. That story is for another
time.
The relevance of the older man is this:
BH thinks that I've been having promiscous
sex with everyone, and that I'd finally found a gay
man to fulfil my desires with, and that he and I
were having shitloads of gay sex. In truth, I suppose
one time might possibly be considered sex, but I
rather doubt it.
BH was convinced that the man and I were
having loads of sex, so I turned on the webcam when
we were in the hotel room to say hi to him. He took
offense. By the way, maybe I haven't mentioned this,
but I've also brought the computer, with the webcam
on, and peed in the bathroom. And yes, this borders
and Waaaay too much information, which is why I stop
right here. Yeah, I'm a strange guy. Tell me something
I didn't know.
In trying to convince him that I was trustworty and
that I trusted him, I decided to get him familiar with
TeamViewer, a program that AJComix had introduced
me to. AJ and some others had used it to...
sort of fuck with another user on YouTube. A long
time back, I found AJComix because he was doing videos
on atheism. He also does tech videos. Quite enjoy
his videos. Right now he's focused on StarCraft 2
or 3 I think.
BH downloaded TeamViewer, and I let him run
free on my computer for a few days, maybe a few
weeks. From what he's told me, he focused on the
gay ads that I posted and responded to when I was
desperate for touch, saying that if I was so into
girls, then why did I have those ads going around?
And he told me that he had stashed his data on
a portable harddrive right before we did the computer
screen watching, because he was sure that I'd see
stuff and use it against him. How's that for ya?
I pointed this contradiction out to him, and he
accused me of being mean, something he was quite
prone to.
Another thing he gotten attached on was the thought
that I was obsessed with MLM, and that I was a Jew,
and that I had some sort of Jew MLM scheme in mind.
Where did he get this from? Well, yes, I've been
interested in MLMs, such as GDI, FHTM, and others
that escape me because they're of such little
relevance now. I also did, and still sort of do,
PTCs, focusing on the only one I trust, NeoBux.
Yes, yes, yes... my continuing failed attempts to
be making money via online instead of by a job;
trying to avoid taxes and the like, though mostly
trying to find a way to make money online.
By the way, when he first met me, I was transitioning
from dropping out of college to basically being
homeless and wandering from place to place. Yes, it
was an interesting time.
From this he came to assume that I was
prostituting myself for a place to stay, and that I
was manipulating people around me for that, and,
probably, "jewing" them out.
People encouraged me to stop talking to him, because
whenever I did, I was really pissy afterwards,
frustrated with his schizophrenic insanity,
repetivity, and downright lies and self-delusion.
He decided that I was being controlled by them
and that I did not have my own free will in talking
with him. Well, in truth, I was talking with him
despite their encouragings.
In trying to get me to admit to my homosexual
multi-level marketing Jew prostituted self, he would
use full names. In showing no effect, he carried
the conversation over to places where others could
see it, including YouTube and Viddler.
Now, you might be amused to find out that I didn't
mind it too much that he had a tendency to use my
full name whenever talking about me or to me.
But he also
used other people's full names, including my sister.
This was NOT ok.
In asking him why he kept doing it, his answer was
that he wanted to use it to help me, to shock me,
into the truth. I haven't come up with an alternative
answer, but since he tends to use full names for
everyone, I'm guessing it's some sort of tick,
the same way that Christians always have their
specific rituals about the oh so holy Lord Jeebus
Christ, always including the specifics.
Generally, I'd just delete only the comments that
contained full names, leaving others there.
I'm against censorship to a fault. My mother and
many others have had concerns about what Bite
says. But, when my sister's full name got mentioned,
and then appeared at the top spot in a google
search for her name, that was crossing the line.
Fuck with me, sure, but fuck with other people who
have nothing to do with this? Fuck that!
The primary concern was about my sister's employment,
since people use google searches to get data about
people. Whether what BH is saying is true or
not, it showed up right up at the top there in the
google search, even with the comment itself deleted.
Fortunately, nothing seems to have come of it,
and it seems to have gone away.
But it is not without angry towards him. And, he
did it out of spite.
"What I love about comment removal is that even in
a search, the comment removed is still searchable. Gotta love explicit metatags!"
This was a comment from a week ago that was left on
theshittytalker channel.
Also, because I find it really amusing, here's
another one that's about 5 months old:
"A holy shaman had to bless my laptop and
cleanse away, with medicinal leaves, the
negative energy
emanating from this channel. He said it is okay to subscribe now no matter
how the old, shy, paws of hell have their
grasp on it."
And actually, that comment is still up.
I laugh whenever I read it.
And another comment that I found in a somewhat
related gmail search was this:
"Will you please kindly remove your access
to me on Viddler the following video"
That's right. I'm responsible for his access
and his actions, not him. And this goes right
alongside the analysis of projection that I
initially made. No, not diagnosis, but analysis.
I don't have bullshit credentials, and I don't
intend to cage the motherfucker. But, he IS
crazy, and he probably needs some sort of help.
He credits me for a suicide attempt that he made,
saying that it's my fault;
he attributes psychological tactics to what I
according to him, do;
and he's vengeful as fuck.
To give a sample of what I typically get when he
talks at me now (keep in mind, this is - now was -
on the theshittytalker channel:
"You are the first official gay on gay hater.
I hope that all the boys you have online masturbation
time with turn your nigger ass in you filthy,
stinky, piece of shit--aaaaannnnd I DO MEAN---SHIT!"
"First it was phvalue323, then it was
thedefendingchamp, now it's TrueEmergence!
But forever it is going to be [full name censored].
You are a filthy, disgusting, bonafide child
molesting asshole with a fucked-up face like
Charlie Brown or Caillou. Your mouth is ugly.
Your sentiments are always a perversion of mercy.
You are a downright, mother fucking, NIGGER of all
NIGGERS, besides being an old fucking fag bag who
no one in their right mind would have sex with.
Your pretentious condescending in your videos makes
you the most loathesome filthy dick sucking asshole
of assholes. But your incessant sexual flirtations
with [full name censored] is more than enough for me.
You are the reigning piece of shit on the panties of
life."
"You are one forever ugly mother fucker.
You troll impressionistic atheists to have gay
sex with them. What is there good about you?
No one gives a fuck about you being gay.
If they did, you would be married. And you, Mary,
are one, seriously ugly mother fucker, ahem, baby
boy fucker. So you really are not celebate.
You like to fuck young boys. Pedophile with a
fucked up mouth. You are an ugly in mind, in heart,
and in soul scum of the earth. You are not eleoquent.
Everything you say is from a script. Fuck you,
fucked up mouth. I'm majoring in English. And you,
Michigan monster, are forever going to be living a
transient life because no one, not
even [full name censored] really wants you.
He merely uses you to take tricks from others for
himself. So go fuck off. You ARE evil, with or
without a God, you are the truest definition of
NIGGER. Later, MASTURBATOR. Never in awhile PEDOPHILE."
So, take that in contrast with some of the stuff
I got from him when he wasn't ... ah... pissed?
at me:
"I got a D on my Atheism midterm. I studied hard.
I knew what I was talking about. But I suspect,
the teacher was not more lenient with me because
I love Jesus.
Mother fucker. I'm good though. All the hot mother
fuckers failed. The ugly bitches got the A's.
The ones who have to beg for cock harder than anything
cause everyone up here believes in Jesus.
Ain't no believer gonna give cock to atheist women.
They might eat their children! They might be monsters.
Hahahaha.
Science doesn't prove atheism. I would like very
much to write to you about everything I have learned
pertaining to Atheism.
Just to show you what I learned. I told my teacher
when I got my D, "I am in love with an atheist.
This is what he looks like. (I showed him a picture
of you that I carry with me all the time on my
iPhone.) I want to impress him by being fluent in
Atheism because I want him to love me. I don't
want him to think I am an airhead like he already
does. I want to carry on intelligent conversations
with him about Atheism. I want to learn about this
subject, so I can better understand him because I
love him. Can you help me bring this grade up so
that I can get an A?"
The teacher offered extra-credit and smiled.
I walked out of the class with my cowboy boots on, my
shorts, and my Abercrombie and Fitch jersey thingy.
I wondered if I just gave you my A&F thing if that
would be good enough to warm you with my heart."
Oh, did I mentioned that he used to say "I love you"
every other sentence or so? Now it's "I still love you."
Once, in an effort to make him less interested in
me, I said that he was fat. Well, he was, but that's
sort of beside the point. Consequently, he made a
valiant effort - that worked - to lose weight.
From that same email:
"I haven't changed. But I have lost weight.
I weigh 208. For me, from 360, that is like,
fucking wow. I can now see my penis. It is
amazing what losing nine pounds can accomplish."
In december of last year, I decided to finally be
done with it and say goodbye to BH. The
video wasn't for him so much as it was for me.
I needed to feel closure, instead of feeling like
I could resolve his insanity with just one more
conversation. I resolved to make a video where I
said all that I felt needed to be said, upload it
on unlisted, and from then on to never respond
to BH. And that's what I did. The video
is two hours long, and I may or may not include
it here. I want to watch it first to make sure it
doesn't contain anything personally identifiable
or too personal. And not including it doesn't
necessarily mean that that's the case; it might
just mean that I haven't gotten around to
re-watching the fucking long video.
It's racked up 41 views. I recall viewing it about
3-4 times in total, while testing the uploads,
so I'm pretty sure that BH has viewed,
or at least visited the page 30 times or so.
Fast forward about 3 months to the present, and you
have BH doc dropping my name in my
profile comment section of SomethingSea1 and
theshittytalker, and each time with a different
account. To remidy this problem, I switched my
accounts to friend-only comments, thus preventing
both the now-blocked channels of BH, plus
new channels he might create. This, however,
would not get rid of the problem of him dropping my
docs on other places besides my channel, which
he has done.
The first was on tattooskin72's channel,
which I've already talked about. Another was on
a different channel that my mother was able to
find from a search or two. The channel hasn't
been logged on to for a month... basically meaning
that there was no way to delete it.
Then I see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4A1LwalIkE
johntheother's video about doc-dropping the
doc-droppers and, though I'm antsy about it,
decide to drop the same parallel docs that were
dropped on me. His name and general location.
I had no idea what this would bring, but, it would
be worth a try. That was the 10th.
At 12:34am, which I saw 5 minutes after it was sent,
because I'm a friggin' vampire, BH sent me
the following email with the title, in all caps,
'REMOVE NAME NAOUGH'
(show pic)
So, let's go over a few things:
1. "I can get expelled for what you are accusing me of."
I am accusing him of stalking. If he can get expelled
for that, that's one fucked up school. But, who
knows. And, besides that, he's in school because
he wants to get with me, and he wants to prove his
sanity to me. Yeah, doing a great job of that.
2. "I have removed all references to you in my power;
do the same for me for my privacy."
Assuming that this has actually been done, this
isn't a good reason for me to remove the details
and data. BH has a track record of deceit.
Additionally, I've only done it once, now twice,
as compared with nearly innumerable examples
from Bite. Leaving the stuff up serves the purpose
of a reminder, and as well, you could say, karma.
It's a bitch, ain't it?
3. "I don't care about the video.
Don't private it, because I can get around a
private to find the words."
Either the fucker learns fast, or he switches from
being his proclaimed techno-illiterate to being
tech savvy when it serves his purpose. I'd say
he's a lying shmuck who's learned a little about
la internete and tried to keep me in the dark about
his knowledge. And after I read that part about
the description and tags, I put the details into
the tags of the other video. Streissand effect
is fun.
This brings us to the end of this video, for the most
part. To respond to some of the comments from the
other video:
from tattoo:
"Well, I've been seeing him drop your name
on quite a few random videos. One was a fucking
music video where he claimed he tried to commit
suicide to the damn song cause of you."
Yep, my mom found that one too.
From AnneOnAMoose:
"If anything happens to you, we know his name
and state. ;)"
Well, problem is, if he comes to me, you don't exactly
have the right State, now do you?
From PretzelLife:
"I have found three addresses for this psycho:
[censored as per agreement]
All are in [censored as per agreement]. If one of these are correct,
I'd really appreciate you telling me so. This guy
scares me."
I haven't the slightist clue. Though, I put Bite's
name plus the street name in a gmail search,
and the [censored as per agreement] one came up with:
"I rode my bicycle five miles south to my home from
Lake Michigan just to hear your voice, just to see you."
From MadShangiStation:
"Late at night. Waiting for a movie to load.
How long has this creep been harassing you?
The MadShangi has taken an interest in your case.
PM me all about your stalker and I'll see what
I can do."
Well, about 4 years now, with about 2-3 of them
being unwanted. I've pretty much given the general
overview of the situation in this video.
I suppose I could forward
to you the thousands of emails we've exchanged,
as well as his address, but I'd be more inclined
to just share his address. But, I expect that
he might be likewise inclined to share mine.
Not sure what to do about that. I suspect that
what I've currently done so far should be disincentive
against him doing much more, but I don't know.
I also have his phone number. He includes it in
many of his emails to me.
Guess what gmail address you can contact BH
at?
So, that's the story of my interactions with
BH, my internet stalker.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Monday, March 7, 2011
Why You Should Feed "The Trolls"
Chair Leg of Continents
Part 1. Trolling and Status
-1. My Problem with "Don't Feed The Trolls"
-2. Why NOT feed the trolls?
-3. What does that have to do with...?
-4. Don't Give Status?
-5. Different Standards: "Real Life" VS Internet ... Legit!
Part 2. Memetic HIV
-1. The Memetic HIV Loop
-2. Disable (Conquest) Is King
-3. Not Just Redundant, But Harmful... or is that Semantics?
-4. Lazy As Fuck = Survival?!
-5. Christianity and Banking
Part 3. Cure?!
-1. "Don't Feed The Trolls" is Pathetically Under-developed
-2. MAD - Mutually-Assured Destruction
-3. Doc-Dropping - Who Cares?
-4. If You Seem Bad, I Feel Better
-5. But... but... HOW? Good Question...
-6. Oh right, I almost forgot...
(This space left intentionally bland for some unknown reason... ah fuck it. We like to waste paper. Wait, what, this is on a blog? NOOOOOOOOO! If it weren't for those kids and their damn dog!...)
Why You Should
Feed
"The Trolls"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/73/Trollface.png
(This space left intentionally bl- Hey! Why have you trapped me in this blog?! I want to get around to wasting paper, not blog-space. How else can I legitimize my otherwise meaningless existence?)
Part 1. Trolling and Status
1. My Problem with "Don't Feed The Trolls"
Something that I've always had trouble with is not talking about stuff. It's reminiscent to me of "Don't Feed The Trolls", something that Orygyn touched on a while back in regard to ThunderF00t:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSljXPUlN_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLj5j39-2rw
2. Why NOT feed the trolls?
And it's not so much even talking about stuff, as seeing everything related, and why can't we talk about blah de blah? It reminds me so much of religion and other things, that it's an irresistible thing for me to ask. Why NOT feed the trolls, if the subject interests you? Thunderf00t, variablast, BiteHunter? And, of course, Not, if there is the possibility of danger. Ah, but WHY would there be danger? So this is the problem: How do you talk about something that could potentially be dangerous without by way of conversation making it even more dangerous? Isn't talking about things supposed to help so that you can plan out why something might be dangerous, that you might prevent that outcome?
3. What does that have to do with...?
And so I'm reminded of variablast. Ni-GARRRR-i-tarianism. Yes, that's intentional. It's not NIGGERtarianism, but NiGAR (Air!) itarianism, like Humanitarianism. For some reason, the pronunciation is vital to the cause. What relevance is this? Because it's hard to talk to the man without going into all these seemingly pointless loops that don't address the main issue: he's using nigger in the same way that people use smurf.
4. Don't Give Status?
In relation to more literary circles, this shows itself as Richard Dawkins saying,
"Would you, if you were a geographer, agree to have a debate with a flat-earther? There comes a point when you have to say you are, by agreeing to appear on a platform, with somebody like that, you are giving them status; if a real scientist appears on a platform, if say a reproductive scientist appeared on a platform with an advocate of stork theory... [crowd laugter] ...
But, I will say this. I've never actually dared to use the formula that my colleague, [Lord] Robert May... When he's asked to have a debate with a creationist, his response is,
'That would look great on your CV, not so good on mine!'"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhmsDGanyes
Perhaps this is me being too far on the fringe in ideology at this point, I don't know, since I have seen a variety of memes. This is in the line of anti-statism, anti-school, anti-compulsion. And it's this:
Doesn't that seem a bit pompous? Doesn't it seem a bit non-addressive? I mean, I understand it, but check out the premise that's being used: gorilla VS gorilla - "you are giving them status". Status? I thought ideas could hold or lose on their own.
5. Different Standards: "Real Life" VS Internet ... Legit!
Then again, I am talking in reference to the internet, and Dawkin's, more or less, isn't. There are different standards for internet and non-internet. Why? Because, as Thunderf00t put, "The internet, where religion comes to die."
Or, as ProfessorAnton put:
(I'm paraphrasing until the video loads for the exact quote:
25:47 - 30:09
"We don't have to say that religion will die. It just may well mean that religions aren't going to be able to live in the internet. If you want to practice your religion, you may have to do it in the oral word, you may have to do it in the written word, you may have to do it in community and in song, and if you try to bring it into this world [internet, YouTube], look out! The medium will kill it!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxLyuCSVTfE
Chapter ONE THOUSAND .... or Part 2. That's fine too... don't mind me over here. You've only TRAPPED ME IN YOUR FUCKING BLOG... So yeah, no big deal... asshole...
Part 2. Memetic HIV
1. The Memetic HIV Loop
What should this all be considered? That acidic mind viruses rely on preying on the methods of communication to spread? I suppose that would make sense. Think of it, and as I read in a book,
'What would be an effective way to eliminate the human species?'
Well, put some disorder to the reproductive system that spread during the vital-for-survival of the species' activities: sex. (HIV, AIDS, so forth.)
And where do ideas have sex? Communication.
Accordingly, perhaps you could consider the new strains of religious insanity and personality defects as people who have no Memetic anti-virus protection, nor have sought it (duh). No preventative vaccine.
Is Memetics (for me, Memetic Engineering), then, akin to having discovered penicillin? Perhaps. But, Dawkins has simply discovered it, coined it, and then, seemingly, abandoned it. Well, no, that's not really the case. It's more along the line of me having wanted to do this all along, but not having a platform, a format, whereby to speak with. Now I do.
2. Disable (Conquest) Is King
So, really... what's the problem? The problem is that we're spending inordinate amount of time and value on things that don't work, and, ultimately, may be extremely counter-productive, and possibly deadly. Not just to oneself, but to our species as a whole. The earth can go on without us; we can't without it.
We, of course, started without verbalization, and now I'm grabbing hold of theories about the past, which is overall fine, but a few aspects of which will probably be shown to be false in the future. That will probably change a few aspects of method here and there, though, unlikely, the intent.
Actually, I've already written on this. I'll link to the Buzz:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/108244673825981390856/posts/aCck7gWFd7q
But I will summarize the point I want to bring forth:
"Eons ago, it started. The first cells, the first organisms. Soon came
bacteria. The bacteria fought. Some grew techniques that disabled the
reproductive process in other bacteria. These bacteria dominated the
spectrum, though it also resulted in a percentage having the lesser
reproductive traits; an interesting mix.
Then came homo sapiens. These were more advanced than bacteria, and
they were able to make even more complex reproduction complexes for
its competition. Why fight when you can disable and not waste energy?
This wasn't, of course, consciously done -- not yet, but it is the
basic nature tendency: find the easiest way possible. Does not water
fall downsteam rather than upstream?
Eventually, homo sapiens became homo sapien sapiens, with something
called language, of which this current homo sapien sapien is using an
advanced form, dubbed in this language as English. With this new
ability for language, came a name for these manipulation tactics:
religion.
The story goes on to explain many things, but what I want to focus on
is the reproductive aspect. There is a thing called marriage, which is
"between a man and wife," a curious phrase, since the female version
of the human species is often considered as property. Property does
not have a soul, something that is required to get into heaven. Heaven
is where you want to be.
...
The prime focus of marriage was that of trying to deal with lust.
Ideally, people wouldn't fuck, instead dedicating themselves to The
Lord. Because doing such a thing is pretty much an impossibility for
most people (hey, how the hell do you think we got here?), a regretful
restriction was placed on the reproductive process instead. Regretful,
in that reproduction could not be stopped outright. The "burning lust"
was worse than a less sinful and God-approved fuckage, for the threat
there was that the teachings would simply be dropped outright of
impossibility.
Now, in this current century, or perhaps more accurately, decade,
marriage, for Christians - at least, Christian boys - is considered
the gateway to pussy. Successful meme? Yep."
Ideally, people wouldn't fuck, instead dedicating themselves to The
Lord. Because doing such a thing is pretty much an impossibility for
most people (hey, how the hell do you think we got here?), a regretful
restriction was placed on the reproductive process instead. Regretful,
in that reproduction could not be stopped outright. The "burning lust"
was worse than a less sinful and God-approved fuckage, for the threat
there was that the teachings would simply be dropped outright of
impossibility.
Now, in this current century, or perhaps more accurately, decade,
marriage, for Christians - at least, Christian boys - is considered
the gateway to pussy. Successful meme? Yep."
3. Not Just Redundant, But Harmful... or is that Semantics?
In addition, when people talk about the utter smallness of humans, and how vast the universe is, they often refer to "the atom", which is composed mostly of empty, unused space. Matter, solid things, are an illusion. In reality, matter is merely highly, highly vibrant energy. So vibrant that it bounces you away so fast that you don't notice it. In atomic theory in my science book, as I recall, the orbits of the atom always take the easily, most energy-efficient path. That is, they're lazy as fuck.
4. Lazy As Fuck = Survival?!
Now, quiz-a me this:
Is it easier to improve oneself to then find a mate to reproduce with who will be impressed,
or disable your competition so that the mate has ONLY YOU as the option?
Guess what gets selected for? That's right: you, you evil son-of-a-bitch! And besides, as the process goes on, things get improved anyway, so what are you complaining about?
5. Christianity and Banking
Applying this to Mind Viruses, guess why it's "atheists believe in nothing", and so on and so forth? If the competition looks scary as shit, looks immoral, looks awful, then Christianity (or insert your local religion here) wins by default. Which reminds me of something: when a house goes down, or when a person goes backrupt, that's called "defaulting". Seems strange to me, almost like it's expected. Probably is.
Chapter AWEOMESAUSE... No? Can I settle for chapter One Thousand? No? Damn... A peanut from the store? Yes? Thanks... No, nevermind, I think I'll just go in the corner and pee on my nuts. I'M DISGUSTING?! YOU'RE, I REPEAT, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO FUCKING TRAPPED ME IN YOUR GODDAMNED BLOG! KIDNAPPPER! GOATNAPPER! GOATSE! RANDOM PROFA- [deleted]
Part 3. Cure?!
1. "Don't Feed The Trolls" is Pathetically Under-developed
But how does this apply to "Don't Feed The Trolls"?
Well, it's what I'd call the newbie version of "Fuck, something's wrong here..."
And, really, pretty much NO work has been doing in this area. And then, as well, the interesting extrapolations on YouTube in regard to this word, as well as the word stalker, have reach, already, saturation. What do I mean by that? I mean that if you disagree with someone, you're called a troll. And if your points were brought up by someone else, you're a troll. If you're annoying something, you're a troll.
And then, and here's where it gets even more interesting to me - say that someone's stalking you, and you call them out on it. "Stop stalking me." But you're on YouTube, and so you two keep making videos about one another, because it's interesting and you're both thinking about it, paranoid about the other. Then comes the irony: the other calls you a stalker, and soon, the boundaries are blurred. You ARE, after all, looking at the other's channel and videos constantly, checking up to see what they're doing. Sure, you've got a reason behind it, but you're STILL stalking them, in technical sense.
2. MAD - Mutually-Assured Destruction
I've not been sure what to make of this, but right now as I'm writing it, it reminds me of the YouTube and Carl Sagan stuff in his book where there is talk about "Mutually-Assured Destruction" - called MAD by the YouTubers. In his book, The Varieties of Scientific Experience,
Carl talks about how having so many nuclear weapons is, essentially, disastrous. We have far more than we need. We could destroy the earth many times over. However, let's just assume for the moment, for the purpose of the illustration I want to check, that we had just enough to blow up the person that might be pissing us off. So, let's check the list of stuffs.
Carl, in the book, then goes on to tell about how using nuclear weapons wrecks havoc on the planet, essentially making it unsuitable for life. Let's assume the smallest scale nuke strike possible.
From wiki:
"A modern thermonuclear weapon weighing little more than a thousand kilograms (2,200 pounds) can produce an explosion comparable to the detonation of more than a billion kilograms (2.2 billion pounds) of conventional high explosive.[2] Thus, even single small nuclear devices no larger than traditional bombs can devastate an entire city by blast, fire and radiation."
"Firstly, even the smallest of the mini-nukes under consideration are a hundred times more powerful that the most powerful conventional weaponry. This means they are not ‘smart’ bombs able to be used selectively against purely military targets, but weapons which will inevitably result in massive devastation to soldiers and civilians alike. Secondly, all nuclear weapons produce dangerous levels of radiation which significantly increase the long term damage of the initial blast and make an area uninhabitable for decades."
Ok, so I'm coming up with nothing specific, and just a lot of theorizing. Anyway...
Putting the MAD strategy to doc dropping (that means dropping someone name, address, and phone number, or any combination of those, in a video or its description, or in a comment, or so forth):
You drop my docs, I drop yours.
3. Doc-Dropping - Who Cares?
Why does it matter to not have your docs dropped? Why is that a threat? Because a lot of people are crazy and would like to come to your house and kill you, and since the internet is accessible to everyone, there's a virtual certainty that they, if your docs were dropped, did so much as disagree with you, that they might go jihad on your ass.
So, essentially, a threat of doc-dropping is a threat of letting crazy people have access to knowing where you live. And they might like to feast on your intestines.
In relation to my stalker, why was doc-dropping a problem? And here we come to the mind-virus aspect. The reasoning was (yes, that's past-tense) that this person used standard English, and how was this person to refer to me except by my name? Yes, this was cleared up with a LOT of talking, and this person still has a tendency to do it ("In order for me to be taken seriously by the greater, professional English professional community of Masters and Doctorate holders, I need to speak fluent English. I am doing my best to use nouns, verbs, pronouns, and other grammatical information properly to be understood clearly."), to try to impress the "higher ups". I wonder how well that's working.
I retaliated by dropping this person's docs (in proportion to what he had dropped about me), and this person went ape-shit, saying that I had done a horrendous thing to this person, and how this person's reputation needed to be protected from slander. Yeah, as if this person needed my help in any sense.
4. If You Seem Bad, I Feel Better
I think the best way to put it is that the method by which to disable a philosophy is that of...
what I'll randomly call the Politics effect. And by this I mean that the meme that is wanted is propped up by means of the negativity surrounding the other one, and it's framed then as being the default.
5. But... but... HOW? Good Question...
The question is, How is this done?
Start with the assumption that the philosophy is correct. Proceed to color the competing meme's philosophy with the assumptions thereheld within yours regarding its assumptions. And remember, your assumptions are valid. It doesn't make sense for them to not be. It's assumed; there's no need to talk about it.
When objections are raised, unconsciously, you are able to find problems with them, according to your own assumptions. And when objections are raised to the assumptions, prepare, Houston, for Loophole Time!
Prepare... for a Memetic HIV!
Annoyingly, I don't have much more to offer in this post. I would like to focus on method, more than anything else, as well as perhaps taking a look at "fallacies" in a new light. Maybe we can finally crack open this walnut that is Human Insanity.
6. Oh right, I almost forgot...
Oh, and to tell you Why You Should Feed Trolls...
FOR SCIENCE! In controlled environments (as far as is possible, you might say), after a lot of theory and strategy as to how more learning could be obtained. Y'know, the scientific method and all that jazz. Will you donate your frustration to science today? xD
I'm actually serious, btw...
Labels:
meme,
memetic,
professoranton,
richard dawkins,
youtube
Which Moral Question Trumps? A convo with JonPaulPrime
Theft, or Need?
6:35 - 7:28
Penn & Laws:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMdxmhAo5Ac
"When someone says 'There outta be a law" there probably ountn't.'"
16:48 - 17:07
Barriers To Entry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDHbVoUsrtI
17:11 - 17:17
The State of the Gaps:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGdG9y1xEVQ
17:19 - 17:32
THE Children:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoGLqKRPRt0
19:09 - 19:48
Rawesome Example:
"Raw Foods Raid - The Fight For the Right To Eat What You Want":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioN0ehlyyXI
19:49 - 21:38
Free To Use:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsfXbZiNDHE
21:39 - 24:04
Zeitgiest Central Computer Communism:
"Voluntaryist Thoughts On Zeitgeist: Moving Forward":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FDbZ4mbkC8
"Economics 101 For The Venus Project: Marginal Utility":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLSxITH-1tE
28:55 - 36:23
Does The Free Market Exist?
"The Game":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33AS5RwTI6E
"The Evils of Intellectual Property By Jeffrey Tucker Part 1":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI7moMzwF8g
http://mises.org/media/4255
http://www.youtube.com/user/misesmedia
"The Case for Legalizing Capitalism | Kel Kelly":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyH27TJJ0RU
36:25 - 37:21
Won't Get Rid Of: Gov't & Religion:
(prices as of 3-7-11)
SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Hardcover]
SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Hardcover] [Bargain Price]
Supersense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Paperback]
Supersense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Audio, CD]
SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Kindle Edition]
Supersense [Audio, Cassette, 2009]
40:00 - 44:37
Emotional Snicker Bar:
43:08 - 43:45
"Well, what if someone offers a better snicker's bar up
for a lower price?"
I missed this one. The problem is covered in
"Free To Use":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsfXbZiNDHE
The problem is that of method - people HAVE to give up
$100 for the $20 snickers, and the State then pockets $80.
Don't want the State snickers? Too bad. You can also
get the better snickers, but you'll also have the State
snickers. Maybe if it's worth it, really worth it, you'll
attempt to make a better snickers. But it has to be worth
at least $100 to even be equivalent to the $20 snickers the
State got you.
Transition:
1:01:20 - 1:01:41
"what do you think I advocate?"
"Basically, bare-minimum gov't, getting out of the way of
the free market."
No, I don't advocate bare-minimum gov't; I'd only advocate that
as part of a transition to NO gov't whatsoever.
1:02:12 - 1:02:47
Central Beam Ship:
"The Collapsed State":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0b520mR6Y
1:02:49 - 1:08:08
Talk + Try:
"Both Sides Are Chippin'":
I think the problem with this segment was that I didn't realize
that you were probably talking about chipping in the sense
of legalities. I'm talking chipping in the sense of conversation,
and may the best meme win. Because of this, I want to make
sure I have a very good understanding of the memes, as well
as the counter-memes, that the best meme might be produced.
I call this Memetic Engineering.
Although, and additionally, either way, the point of focus
is the truth. Is the truth is that minarchism is the best,
so be it. If the free market, so be it. If gov't, then so be it.
But I guess that has to be the focal point: What is the reality
of the situation, and how shall we deal with it?, rather than,
OMFG, HIDE! OMFG, YOU'RE WRONG!
1:11:43 - 1:12:35
Zeitgeist Central Planning:
See
"Zeitgiest Central Computer Communism" above.
1:12:37 - 1:16:00
Shallow Extrapolation: Our Need To See, Feel, and Have, even if it's Wrong:
IQ: A Smart History of a Failed Idea [Hardcover]
1:23:07 - 1:24:17
SuperSense
1:26:01 - 1:26:39
Michael Shermer:
"Michael Shermer: Why people believe strange things":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T_jwq9ph8k
"Michael Shermer: The pattern behind self-deception":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_6-iVz1R0o
"Michael Shermer: Baloney Detection Kit":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUB4j0n2UDU
The series I was referring to - it's not this first
one, but it's in one of them, and they're a great
series:
"Beyond Belief: Science, Religion, Reason and Survival - Session 1":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKyFkAfmwFA
1:28:18 - 1:31:49
variablast - Secretly a free-marketeer seeking fame and money:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zxty54_iyI
The video is now on private.
1:33:47 - 1:35:04
variablast hates JonPaulPrime:
"Fuck your god!":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIBLM8Necu0
Users:
Variablast:
http://www.youtube.com/user/variablast
http://www.youtube.com/user/niggeritarian
JacobSpinney:
http://www.youtube.com/user/jacobspinney
http://www.youtube.com/user/OtherJacobSpinney
JonPaulPrime:
http://www.youtube.com/user/jonpaulprime
SomethingSea:
http://www.youtube.com/user/SomethingSea1
Penn:
http://www.youtube.com/user/pennsays
http://www.youtube.com/user/pennpoint
6:35 - 7:28
Penn & Laws:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMdxmhAo5Ac
"When someone says 'There outta be a law" there probably ountn't.'"
16:48 - 17:07
Barriers To Entry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDHbVoUsrtI
17:11 - 17:17
The State of the Gaps:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGdG9y1xEVQ
17:19 - 17:32
THE Children:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoGLqKRPRt0
19:09 - 19:48
Rawesome Example:
"Raw Foods Raid - The Fight For the Right To Eat What You Want":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioN0ehlyyXI
19:49 - 21:38
Free To Use:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsfXbZiNDHE
21:39 - 24:04
Zeitgiest Central Computer Communism:
"Voluntaryist Thoughts On Zeitgeist: Moving Forward":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FDbZ4mbkC8
"Economics 101 For The Venus Project: Marginal Utility":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLSxITH-1tE
28:55 - 36:23
Does The Free Market Exist?
"The Game":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33AS5RwTI6E
"The Evils of Intellectual Property By Jeffrey Tucker Part 1":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI7moMzwF8g
http://mises.org/media/4255
http://www.youtube.com/user/misesmedia
"The Case for Legalizing Capitalism | Kel Kelly":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyH27TJJ0RU
36:25 - 37:21
Won't Get Rid Of: Gov't & Religion:
(prices as of 3-7-11)
SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Hardcover]
SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Hardcover] [Bargain Price]
Supersense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Paperback]
Supersense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Audio, CD]
SuperSense: Why We Believe in the Unbelievable [Kindle Edition]
Supersense [Audio, Cassette, 2009]
Emotional Snicker Bar:
43:08 - 43:45
"Well, what if someone offers a better snicker's bar up
for a lower price?"
I missed this one. The problem is covered in
"Free To Use":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsfXbZiNDHE
The problem is that of method - people HAVE to give up
$100 for the $20 snickers, and the State then pockets $80.
Don't want the State snickers? Too bad. You can also
get the better snickers, but you'll also have the State
snickers. Maybe if it's worth it, really worth it, you'll
attempt to make a better snickers. But it has to be worth
at least $100 to even be equivalent to the $20 snickers the
State got you.
Transition:
1:01:20 - 1:01:41
"what do you think I advocate?"
"Basically, bare-minimum gov't, getting out of the way of
the free market."
No, I don't advocate bare-minimum gov't; I'd only advocate that
as part of a transition to NO gov't whatsoever.
1:02:12 - 1:02:47
Central Beam Ship:
"The Collapsed State":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce0b520mR6Y
1:02:49 - 1:08:08
Talk + Try:
"Both Sides Are Chippin'":
I think the problem with this segment was that I didn't realize
that you were probably talking about chipping in the sense
of legalities. I'm talking chipping in the sense of conversation,
and may the best meme win. Because of this, I want to make
sure I have a very good understanding of the memes, as well
as the counter-memes, that the best meme might be produced.
I call this Memetic Engineering.
Although, and additionally, either way, the point of focus
is the truth. Is the truth is that minarchism is the best,
so be it. If the free market, so be it. If gov't, then so be it.
But I guess that has to be the focal point: What is the reality
of the situation, and how shall we deal with it?, rather than,
OMFG, HIDE! OMFG, YOU'RE WRONG!
1:11:43 - 1:12:35
Zeitgeist Central Planning:
See
"Zeitgiest Central Computer Communism" above.
1:12:37 - 1:16:00
Shallow Extrapolation: Our Need To See, Feel, and Have, even if it's Wrong:
1:23:07 - 1:24:17
SuperSense
1:26:01 - 1:26:39
Michael Shermer:
"Michael Shermer: Why people believe strange things":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T_jwq9ph8k
"Michael Shermer: The pattern behind self-deception":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_6-iVz1R0o
"Michael Shermer: Baloney Detection Kit":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUB4j0n2UDU
The series I was referring to - it's not this first
one, but it's in one of them, and they're a great
series:
"Beyond Belief: Science, Religion, Reason and Survival - Session 1":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKyFkAfmwFA
1:28:18 - 1:31:49
variablast - Secretly a free-marketeer seeking fame and money:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zxty54_iyI
The video is now on private.
1:33:47 - 1:35:04
variablast hates JonPaulPrime:
"Fuck your god!":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIBLM8Necu0
Users:
Variablast:
http://www.youtube.com/user/variablast
http://www.youtube.com/user/niggeritarian
JacobSpinney:
http://www.youtube.com/user/jacobspinney
http://www.youtube.com/user/OtherJacobSpinney
JonPaulPrime:
http://www.youtube.com/user/jonpaulprime
SomethingSea:
http://www.youtube.com/user/SomethingSea1
Penn:
http://www.youtube.com/user/pennsays
http://www.youtube.com/user/pennpoint
Friday, March 4, 2011
Where Are All My Variablast Videos?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMK50doaOu8
Here.
September 14, 2010
On Variablast
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEO0BClmF0s
September 27, 2010
Niggering The Dictionary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kSUod7sLxU
Assertion Without Substance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQk7INgTOtY
Re: Re: Assertion Without Substance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgR-ian-E88
September 30, 2010
To Mr. Nigger: Beautiful Slave
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN9jI1aARwU
To Mr. Nigger - The Logic of it, Not Racism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBLm-V2hTfY
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y06BKXG9sPA
Niggering Slave
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzrHoNLQJ9c
Proud To Be A Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxPLKuwu-uU
Variablast: My Last Word On and/or To... At least for now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55myZekDL8
Poor Taste - Proud To Be A Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcQFEQyQZTI
October 1, 2010
To Politicrafty (Variablast) - Because It Doesn't Make Sense To Me, And Here's Why
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y06BKXG9sPA
me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYoFxHaEj6A
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rc6waomg-k
me: To Politicrafry - Time To Say Goodbye?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wkp9LHnMHu8
To Politicrafty - Putting the Cart before the Horse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1B8dLMCltw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9gHayaejgU
Politicrafty is a Self-Denying Anarchist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwnqUVoYs0s
October 4, 2010
Some Thoughts on Method - Niggering Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIa85pS0pLs
Oct 10, 2010
Watching A Nigger Nigger Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyQb9Bx6Npk
Niggering and Anti-Statism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqme-kFyt6w
October 11, 2010
What The Hell Is Primmelling?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3anSslLtJmw
October 15, 2010
On "Nigger"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfCmxicMHLY
Fuck You, Too, Variablast
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJJBx3z6nUk
October 21, 2010
Debating variablast - Niggering Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRkZuQRv9GA
October 22, 2010
Talking with Variablast on Stickam
1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2FZvwWxUZo
2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaAqkIqWMWY
3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfKeWk_bxF0
4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D075xq2h3Ik
5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGr5RFyQMA4
6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEA8dSBoePM
7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Nyqi9IN0w
8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5yqtxinccM
9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0PV4Sko6h8
10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPkWWblYAU8
11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwwc63sG9I0
12 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGNhg9g-7bE
October 26, 2010
Modern Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVQIveC5s78
November 8, 2010
The Cult of Nigger (the g is silent)
http://www.viddler.com/explore/SomethingSea/videos/828/
December 2, 2010
Is Variablast Speech Coercive?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nM2TWHHi3Q
January 25, 2011
Response to Orygyn: Tyrant of Language?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clU1PH2MnY4
January 27, 2011
Nigger and Language - History and Usage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS67CaS3u24
Variablast Means Hero... Fails
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTytl9I4mFM
Variablast, Step Off
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMJaTRbn4Tc
(theshittytalker) variablast nigger orygyn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69AkKsZShC0
February 10, 2011
(theshittytalker) Closedmindedness and Niggerphobia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zv3lb9jxsAM
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-fCxqDNYus
me: (theshittytalker) Closedmindedness and Niggerphobia, part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5yLPlP5-o
me: (theshittytalker) Asking About The Niggertarian Movement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiSLppn7LXM
him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZapTcqU0F8s
(Feb 17) me: (theshittytalker) Nig Air It Airian Ism - What's So Important About The Pronunciation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erZGtEZ7_Cg
Feb 17, 2011
(theshittytalker) Face Tattoos and Adaption
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ2_ZRhhj6s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODWE0ICy-DU
(theshittytalker) Niggeritarian's Rapism - Same Word, Opposite Meaning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSeIWu7lhGk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOYZqiP8a-k
February 18, 2011
(theshittytalker) Probably a Last response to variablast
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvrNGE0CKm0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISylwpbcdDE
Variablast And BiteHunter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxYgBqxhLYs
I'm A Theistarian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AQKgI3eb0k
February 24, 2011
An Idea For Amoebeating Your A-word
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZnoHIpkuZk
March 3, 2011
Addicted to Variablast - Smurfing Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY9E7qXXw18
March 4, 2011
Addicted to Variablast - Nigger And Smurf Word Structure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ-oXkoCR5E
Addicted to Variablast - Suggestion Regarding Repeating Yourself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBXeE3LcKCw
Addicted to Variablast - The Question Refined
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1ArucIlkNA
Moving variablast responses to talkingwithvariablas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDTHgTTVjZc
Here.
September 14, 2010
On Variablast
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEO0BClmF0s
September 27, 2010
Niggering The Dictionary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kSUod7sLxU
Assertion Without Substance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQk7INgTOtY
Re: Re: Assertion Without Substance
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgR-ian-E88
September 30, 2010
To Mr. Nigger: Beautiful Slave
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN9jI1aARwU
To Mr. Nigger - The Logic of it, Not Racism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBLm-V2hTfY
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y06BKXG9sPA
Niggering Slave
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzrHoNLQJ9c
Proud To Be A Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxPLKuwu-uU
Variablast: My Last Word On and/or To... At least for now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55myZekDL8
Poor Taste - Proud To Be A Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcQFEQyQZTI
October 1, 2010
To Politicrafty (Variablast) - Because It Doesn't Make Sense To Me, And Here's Why
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y06BKXG9sPA
me:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYoFxHaEj6A
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rc6waomg-k
me: To Politicrafry - Time To Say Goodbye?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wkp9LHnMHu8
To Politicrafty - Putting the Cart before the Horse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1B8dLMCltw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9gHayaejgU
Politicrafty is a Self-Denying Anarchist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwnqUVoYs0s
October 4, 2010
Some Thoughts on Method - Niggering Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIa85pS0pLs
Oct 10, 2010
Watching A Nigger Nigger Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyQb9Bx6Npk
Niggering and Anti-Statism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqme-kFyt6w
October 11, 2010
What The Hell Is Primmelling?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3anSslLtJmw
October 15, 2010
On "Nigger"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfCmxicMHLY
Fuck You, Too, Variablast
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJJBx3z6nUk
October 21, 2010
Debating variablast - Niggering Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRkZuQRv9GA
October 22, 2010
Talking with Variablast on Stickam
1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2FZvwWxUZo
2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaAqkIqWMWY
3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfKeWk_bxF0
4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D075xq2h3Ik
5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGr5RFyQMA4
6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEA8dSBoePM
7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Nyqi9IN0w
8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5yqtxinccM
9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0PV4Sko6h8
10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPkWWblYAU8
11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwwc63sG9I0
12 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGNhg9g-7bE
October 26, 2010
Modern Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVQIveC5s78
November 8, 2010
The Cult of Nigger (the g is silent)
http://www.viddler.com/explore/SomethingSea/videos/828/
December 2, 2010
Is Variablast Speech Coercive?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nM2TWHHi3Q
January 25, 2011
Response to Orygyn: Tyrant of Language?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clU1PH2MnY4
January 27, 2011
Nigger and Language - History and Usage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS67CaS3u24
Variablast Means Hero... Fails
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTytl9I4mFM
Variablast, Step Off
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMJaTRbn4Tc
(theshittytalker) variablast nigger orygyn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69AkKsZShC0
February 10, 2011
(theshittytalker) Closedmindedness and Niggerphobia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zv3lb9jxsAM
him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-fCxqDNYus
me: (theshittytalker) Closedmindedness and Niggerphobia, part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5yLPlP5-o
me: (theshittytalker) Asking About The Niggertarian Movement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiSLppn7LXM
him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZapTcqU0F8s
(Feb 17) me: (theshittytalker) Nig Air It Airian Ism - What's So Important About The Pronunciation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erZGtEZ7_Cg
Feb 17, 2011
(theshittytalker) Face Tattoos and Adaption
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ2_ZRhhj6s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODWE0ICy-DU
(theshittytalker) Niggeritarian's Rapism - Same Word, Opposite Meaning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSeIWu7lhGk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOYZqiP8a-k
February 18, 2011
(theshittytalker) Probably a Last response to variablast
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvrNGE0CKm0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISylwpbcdDE
Variablast And BiteHunter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxYgBqxhLYs
I'm A Theistarian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AQKgI3eb0k
February 24, 2011
An Idea For Amoebeating Your A-word
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZnoHIpkuZk
March 3, 2011
Addicted to Variablast - Smurfing Nigger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY9E7qXXw18
March 4, 2011
Addicted to Variablast - Nigger And Smurf Word Structure
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ-oXkoCR5E
Addicted to Variablast - Suggestion Regarding Repeating Yourself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBXeE3LcKCw
Addicted to Variablast - The Question Refined
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1ArucIlkNA
Moving variablast responses to talkingwithvariablas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDTHgTTVjZc
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Blessed Be Your Life
Twist on
"Blessed Be Your Name"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikzeFW2Ufg4
Blessed Be Your Life
"Blessed be your life
In the land that is strife
Where your talks
in abundance flow;
blessed be your life.
Blessed be your life
When I'm talking
in this crappy place,
when I see
all these idiots;
blessed be your life.
Every talk we have on here
I enjoy quite a bit.
When the idiots
try to jip us,
Still I say:
Blessed be your life
and our talks.
Blessed be your life.
Blessed be our lives
collectively.
Blessed be this interesting
time.
Blessed be your life
When conversation
is proceeding real well,
when the world
isn't being censored to hell;
blessed be your life.
Blessed be your life
On the road
marked with idiots;
Though there's morons
begging for attention,
Blessed be your life.
Every talk we have with each other
progresses our lives.
When the morons
close in, guys,
still I will say:
Blessed be your life
and talks.
Blessed be your life.
Blessed be con-ver-sa-tion.
Blessed be talkin'.
You make responses and so do I.
You make responses and so do I.
My mind will analyze them:
"Is this full of fucking crap?"
Every conversation we have
I hope becomes five more.
When the idiots
close in, guys,
still I will say:
Blessed be your life
and talks.
Blessed be your life.
Blessed be our talks.
Blessed be conversation.
You make responses and so do I.
You make responses and so do I.
My mind will analyze them:
"Is this full of fucking crap?""
"Blessed Be Your Name"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikzeFW2Ufg4
Blessed Be Your Life
"Blessed be your life
In the land that is strife
Where your talks
in abundance flow;
blessed be your life.
Blessed be your life
When I'm talking
in this crappy place,
when I see
all these idiots;
blessed be your life.
Every talk we have on here
I enjoy quite a bit.
When the idiots
try to jip us,
Still I say:
Blessed be your life
and our talks.
Blessed be your life.
Blessed be our lives
collectively.
Blessed be this interesting
time.
Blessed be your life
When conversation
is proceeding real well,
when the world
isn't being censored to hell;
blessed be your life.
Blessed be your life
On the road
marked with idiots;
Though there's morons
begging for attention,
Blessed be your life.
Every talk we have with each other
progresses our lives.
When the morons
close in, guys,
still I will say:
Blessed be your life
and talks.
Blessed be your life.
Blessed be con-ver-sa-tion.
Blessed be talkin'.
You make responses and so do I.
You make responses and so do I.
My mind will analyze them:
"Is this full of fucking crap?"
Every conversation we have
I hope becomes five more.
When the idiots
close in, guys,
still I will say:
Blessed be your life
and talks.
Blessed be your life.
Blessed be our talks.
Blessed be conversation.
You make responses and so do I.
You make responses and so do I.
My mind will analyze them:
"Is this full of fucking crap?""
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
